Religion is the historic and present day cause of oppression for heterosexual women, gay men, bisexuals, lesbians and transpersons – who were named with various terms in law as illegal.
It is important to note that gay and lesbian, and by association, bisexual were removed from the diagnostic manual of mental health in the 1970s.
Whereas, transgender falls under body dysmorphia; and the academic idea of trans gender theory is more diagnosis projected onto a sexually reproducting species, where bigotry and fetish are known to be related to the heterosexual male homophobia and transphobia court words in defense of rape and murder.
and Lesbians of all women, are the most fetishized by heterosexual and transwomen
nonbinary is an emerging demographic which has not formed a shared identity to be a demographic, while in some government levels being recognized with nonbinary being a gender option
which really is going to require individual or three public bathrooms
one for hetero men, one for gay, bi men, transpersons and nonbinary and one for women, to maximize public safety.
those LGBTQ2 who are religious have to really think about the self loathing and desire to belong to a larger community than oneself.
and demographics that share characteristics and form dating pools. such as gay men and lesbians, who have nonprocreative sex by defination and which was used as justification for denial of marriage equality, does not get to be put aside
as if lesbians are the ones not at risk of date rape when denied a no to a date in the first place.
so. like an atheist does not have to practise any religion
lesbians are radical feminists, whether can cite specific theories or not, lesbian is the application of feminism
and those who do not share the primary characteristics, born female, do not get to self identify in
heterosexual men claim all women are bisexual and then they claim to be lesbians owing to attraction to women
which lesbians are not attracted to all women, not even other lesbians who are in the demographic of lesbian.
women determine the words to define ourselves and transwoman seeking those words to be changed is the ultimate mansplaining and depersonalizing the women’s lived experience
lesbians who call a penis a vagina have been gaslighted and peer bullied.
meanwhile, athiesm remains a heterosexual male vs heterosexual male domain, without regard to the demographics who experience the culture wars, the racial bigotry, the gender oppression and gender based sexual violence
which health care, police and science and social literacy, should give every adult pause to consider that there is an identifiable group which by defination excludes a category of persons born observed male, who failing to meet the social expectations now considers feelings to be facts, despite objective reality
because guess who the most known ones are?
white heterosexual men
meanwhile. atheists are underrepresented in prisons which favour a find jesus for pardons
atheism is not a claim, it is the rejection of the claim theism asserts
arguing over what words mean and one side defining the other
is part of the nonsense. those with religion really cannot understand non believers
who are not being immature or rebelling or secretly agreeing.
it is a rejection of religion.
word wanking between heterosexual men
religion has zero proof and predicts nothing
athiesm is not limited to heterosexual men
and there does not even have to a reason to reject any and all religions
other than one is not convinced by any
no higher education needed and religion is not education
it is not history and it is not law, outside of theocracies
and it is not therapy or treatment for anything
religion is the claim and proof of authority in itself
the original pyramid scheme
from the article:
Offering a bizarrely enticing description of sex between same-sex couples, Hibbs said, “When two people of the same sex get together, it’s out of sheer wanton lust and pleasure only for self.”
“Nothing comes of it. No life can come from it. No family can come from it,” he continued.
“If you’re an evolutionist, you have to be against same-sex unions,” Hibbs said. “If you’re an evolutionist, what is one of the statements? It’s the survival of the fittest, right? And in evolutionary theory, the survival of the fittest has to procreate.”
He added: “But if evolution is true, then there would be no such thing as homosexuality, because over the last 400 trillion, billion, zillion, quadbillion, zillion, nillion, years, evolution would have washed that out.”
Then came his most curious assertion: “Homosexuality — LGBTQ actions — prove the existence of God, because God’s word says this would be some of the outcome and actions of the Last Days.”
no. from an evolution standpoint,
adults who do not have children, take care of closely related children, conferring a benefit to the family/community
gay men, lesbians and bisexuals also would provide other work productively into the community differing from heterosexual contributions of hunting, farming, home/ community building.
crafting and creative and technology pursuits, by those free of family life
so this is religion not understanding science
which biology is not the science study that challenges or disproves a deity
anthropology is
and many cultures had many kinds of roles
and the world has primarily been hetero men
to that even in europe, not long ago
there were no women in theatre
and there are few women in atheism,
because it is not much less sexist and oppressive to women
and lgbtq2 than religion
but atheism is indifferent to owing to heterosexual male dominance of unconcern of how other demographics experience heterosexual males of all ethnicities.
while religion is about controlling and opposing
heterosexual women and removing obstacles or threats to heterosexual men